Inconspicuous Consumption

Class Trips: Exhibits

2008-11-09T17:02:00.002-05:00

The works at 11 Rivington, inspired by its own sense of "randomness", felt like visual betrayal. "Nature" branding his works, seemed to me a little misleading: I could almost picture bees in a box, building around the metal framing that the artist provided, creating a curtain on an otherwise unspectacular site.

What really captured my curiosity, though, was the seductive sensibility that the evolution of these particular forms revealed. An evolution birthed out of some social process of building that created, within its remarkable symmetry, pockets of rebellion where a small group of bees decided to "build differently". In "Programmed Hive #8", I could see small bulges of nest built out of diligence, and perhaps frustration, reacting to those genetically-induced processes of building and growth that underly their existence.

Berseth's hives also induce me to contemplate nature as experimentation. BIOMIMICRY - a field devoted to understanding the relationship of biological processes to human design processes. I wonder, what would have happened if Berseth, once the hive had been well established, moved it out of a box and into a tree, where elements of weather would have exposed the bees to a new context in which to create? What would living in a bee hive be like, if you constructed an entire small edifice out of their honeycomb? What happens around the same programmed aluminum frame if the artist turns it upside down? The project reflects the rawness of the pseudo-natural (after all, is anything natural once removed from nature?), and exposes the limited understanding I have of its ways.

More more Research

2008-10-15T17:04:00.005-04:00

In 2001, NY Dept. of City Planning released a statement detailing the major redistricting effort around the Queensboro Plaza subway stop:

Not surprisingly, the aptly-named Sunnyside Yards appears as a giant white void, something to be avoided and forgotten, rather than confronted. It speaks to the political dynamics of the neighborhood, perhaps, that the north side of LIC will be the center for investment and development whereas across the tracks, the community will remain, flat. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Some future plans?

Today, the Sunnyside Railyard is sometimes mentioned as the potential site of a new stadium, but it is currently being used jointly by Amtrak, LIRR and freight lines as a storage and maintenance facility. (Photo, left, by BobVogel )

[If the long-discussed East Side Access project, which would connect the LIRR to Grand Central Terminal, is ever constructed, a new Sunnyside station would be built in the yards under Queens Boulevard. Public transit projects like this and the Second Avenue subway are never a priority for state and federal funding, however. -- your webmaster]

I sort of imagine it to be the site of an "arena" though I'm curious as to what would take place? What if it became another type of bridge, where it became a stage for real human interaction and drama, rather than an uncomfortable medium for transition? What if it established a metaphysical, rather than industrial, function that linked the two seemingly alien parts of the LIC? What would this look like? Who would inhabit it? Who would stop? Would it be a place of experience or a means of transition?

More Research

2008-10-11T23:00:00.002-04:00

Using Oasis, I discovered some really interesting data that backed up my observations at the site itself.

For one, within (roughly) a three mile radius of the site, there are three small playgrounds.
There are 0 state or city owned parks.
A strong storm would effectively flood the hell out of that enormous trench (looking for any empirical data that backs up that assumption.
"Green spaces" exist as unattended foliage and weeds, left to develop in concrete cracks and behind fences -- propped iron demarcating the private property of those who feel they need to protect ownership of their weeds.

All of these observations lead to interesting questions regarding demographics. My visit to the site showed plenty of activity: lots of cab garages, car chop shops, and contractors house themselves in low one or two-story buildings. The larger buildings adjacent to the LIRR train yard were obviously empty --> or so it would seem. Artifacts left around some sites suggest that someone (or, technically something) still wanders at least some of these buildings.

What should my Metaform address? What are the needs of the neighborhood? What do the inhabitants love/lack?

Maybe there are so few playgrounds in LIC b/c there are so few kids (of course, the analogy can work in reverse!). But where do the adults play? Besides a porn video shop, leisure in its most typical urban forms (bars and clubs, open playing fields, sit-in restaurants or cinemas) seemed utterly absent in my site visit. INdustry, in its various forms, dominates the topography. But I went in the evening, as the sun dwindled down, I felt myself overwhelmed by something more frightening then footsteps: Silence.

So I thought about creating an interactive game, something that draws attention to this unique geo-social void that developed a subway stop away from Midtown in Queens. Indeed, the neighborhood seems to have the heart, but the not the scale, of Midtown financial towers culture. Should I focus on creating a game that addresses the neighborhood's history? That relates to the neighborhood's infrastructure? This becomes the next question.

Maps

2008-10-08T18:00:00.006-04:00

Class starts in a bit, I thought I could finish my new website but my domain name broker didn't finish the deal in time. Maybe next week.

About my idea.

LIC Area Code 11101.

Following: Density Map (courtesy of The Gothamist)

A land use map. Red means nooooooo access. The lines show transportation means around the map. The thick lines show active, medium and inactive usage of transportation mediums around the LIRR North train yard.

I call this the "X-ray". The flat maroon area, ironically, has the most heavy activity on the map. Dominated by monstrous building machines. An Amtrak employee I harassed told me this would be the underground network linking JFK and LaGuardia to the major Manhattan portals. LIC will not be a stop? It will be a shuttle past all of these communities?

I'm currently working on a map of churches, DVD porn shops, police stations, and condos. I want to get an idea of the spatial relationship of deviance to authority.

I'm also working on a 3D density model. Will upload pics after class.

Kyle

The Interview Ctd.

2008-10-01T18:16:00.002-04:00

So I get in. I meet a woman in the the company's woodshop named Jenny T. She can't answer my questions, but she's chatty. We discuss relatives in Brasil, and she tells me about megablocks in Brasilia and favelas in Sao Paolo. She's confident and charming. I offer her the wine, she sets it aside uninterested. Here's the interview, transcribed from memory, off the cuff:

Q: What is it, specifically that you do up here? (Note: her and staff remain tucked in the deepest corner of an enormous 3-floor office space.)
A: Well, we put together models (gorgeous accent). People bring us their designs, we make them 3-dimensional.
Q: What are your favorite kinds of designs to work on?
A: Residential mostly, though we get very few of those here. One partner keeps getting commissions to build residences in _________ (insert ritzy Connecticut community name here). All of the detailing and the trimming...we make doll-house sized models that you can really look into and get a feel for.
Q: What about the larger-scale models that the firm does for institutions or big-pocket developers.
A: Some of them go elsewhere for modeling. Most of the work we do in here, with styrofoam, wood, plexi, particle board, chip board...a lot of elevations and topographical models.
Q: Why do you think models of the bigger projects require less detail?
A: Because they are designed with less detail [laughs]. It's an aesthetic. We try to do solid work here, good work that lasts a while. This is a serious firm: renovations, historical preservation. It is good work.
Q: Do you produce exclusively for BBB?
A: No, we bounce around, and we rent out office space to other firms [Note: she takes me afterwards to visit the workspace of a certain Pritzker Winner to see the work he is up to] so in certain situations we help out other studios. I worked at _______ ________ Group for a while. [Really? I thought they were a developer, or property manager?].
No, they are actually...well, they are very trendy, but they don't make work that lasts. You know, they do the designs -- casinos, restaurants and bars -- and the concept is only meant to be glitzy and lit up, but it's not meant to last. They operate as if they intend everything to be torn down eventually. And it always is. I have a problem with that, consciencely, but to each his own.
Q: Do you experiment a lot in here?
A: Yes, we do [breaks out sample boxes, shows off laser cutter].
Q: Who does the actual production of the scale buildings? Who discusses fabrication techniques with contractors and builders?
A: I don't know, that's a good question. The project manager?
Q: Do you ever give an architect or designer feedback on a project?
A: Well, yes, I'll ask them, "Well how are you going to do this" and "Are you sure that's going to give you the effect that you want"? It's pretty open here, I guess you're expected to sort of stay quiet, but the Swede in me just can't let it go, I think all of the girls in here are pretty open about projects. The quiet thing is a corporate thing, I think, but it's good.

We share stories on the way out of the office. She needs an upholsterer, I know a guy, she gives me her e-mail. I see the partner on the way out. He's busy, no time to talk.

The Interview

2008-10-01T17:59:00.001-04:00

It really didn't go as smoothly as I had originally hoped. An open-ended survey to 10 of the prominent architecture + design magazines went unanswered. The survey, and the ultimate methodology underlying it:

10 Questions: Power in Architecture

Please articulate how you, in your capacity as a professional within the 'field', see each concept's relationship to architecture?
1. Progressivism
2. Relevance
3. Irrelevance
4. Radicalism
5. Urbanism
6. Tolerance
7. Eroticism
8. Sterility
9. Equality
10. You

An open-ended survey grants the interviewee (and therefore her audience) the possibility of a confrontation with her own sense of sef; as both lover of architecture and professional operating within its power structure as the discriminator of information. The terms are loaded, often with sexual motifs, or terminology utilized excessively within movements of justice. How does the mind, upon establishing the perspective ("capacity as a professional") analyze these loaded terms? What underlying logic drives the response? Was this done by committee or was this done independent of others within her work culture?

So I transitioned: could I manage to touch bases with a senior partner at a prominent architecture firm? The questions:

1. How does your position within BBB shape your understanding of architecture as an academic or theoretical philosophy?
2. What makes architecture relevant?
3. irrelevant?
4. Which came first, the architect or the academic?
5. Who comes first: the client or the community?
6. Who comes last: Fred the person or Fred the architect?
7. Which is larger...your model shop team or your marketing department?
8. Is there any building, development, community, or law that you would encourage (or have actually lobbied for) the removal of from the physical or political landscape of NYC?
9. What would you replace it with?
10. Define radical architecture.

And I received the interview. But not in time. Important people have things to do. I can't wait until Friday. I show up unannounced. He is on meetings the receptionist tells me. Who am I? I'm the guy holding a bottle of wine looking for this guy to do my goddamn interview. I start to name drop...

Manifesto

2008-09-24T17:42:00.002-04:00

Click to view larger.

Inspiration:

Computer Problems

2008-09-23T14:21:00.003-04:00

I've been battling a virus that first infected my OS through MS Word, and has slowly spread to all things on all three of my hard drives. Techies say they can recover all of my applications without jettisoning most of the content that I created on them, so when I find a way to get all those random city pictures up, I will. In the meantime, I'll be at NYU's Media Lab working on my Manifesto and catching up on everyone else's Metaforms schtuff.

k

Wrestling with Graffiti

2008-09-15T14:00:00.004-04:00

My Murray Hill, my Gramercy. Strangled by a cluster fuck of chains that have invaded like the plague (and I've been here less than a year). More services! Less diversity, less choice, less...life. And that was all BEFORE NYU bought a dorm down the street.

How do you know when you're suffocating (or, in the evolution of things, already caput)? How do you know when you're sunk? I remember hearing the stories, of coal mine workers using canaries to ensure that oxygen levels were sufficient to keep them alive long enough to finish a day's work.

But then, what can be said about the rapid decimation of commercial diversity up and down third avenue can be extended to a whole lot of problems in the world as a whole.

From previous class discussion:

I wanted to do a little research on sculptural grafitti, and encoutered an interesting result to my search for 3-d graffiti art from weburbanist.com:

3D graffiti, whether itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s in chalk or paint, on walls or the street, represents a new way of combining the mastery of Renaissance art techniques with the gritty, ephemeral qualities of amazing street art. These 3D street artists gives graffiti a whole new meaning Ã¢â‚¬â€œ one that departs from the conventional interpretation of graffiti as vandalism in the form of images and letters scrawled on public property. Artists like Kurt Wenner, Eduardo Relero and Tracy Lee Stum create street art thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s so incredible it is almost impossible to pass by without being sucked in to the worlds they create on asphalt and concrete surfaces.

It occurred to me that in discussing the rigid definitions of graffiti, we became absorbed in a discussion about what defines the authentic in this particular culture. So it begs the question: do these particular works of (mostly) commissioned street art belong to the genre defined as graffiti? WebUrbanist seems to think so. Yet if the medium is more important than the meaning (paid art by chalk is more authentic than rebellion by projected image), hasn't the spirit of graffiti already been abandoned?

And the architect inside is interested in knowing...can we expand the physical mediums beyond a flat surface to articulate a new dimension to graffiti culture (as i argue projection 'graffiti' does)?

Photo ESSaY

2008-09-10T18:02:00.004-04:00

More:

http://flickr.com/photos/30377480@N02/

LOOK HERE FOR PORTFOLIO STUFF

2008-09-08T22:03:00.001-04:00

Metaforms:

Upload unfunctional:

See e-mail for portfolio pics.

KYle

2007-12-29T02:40:00.000-05:00

The airport, to some, can be a fairly confusing place. How are people shaped by this rather unique environment? How do airports control movement, and how do they balance our demands for safety while constructing a space which ensures some feeling of privacy? I direct readers to take a look at Ventriloquism, where Duncan provides great insight into the relationship between people and place, this time focusing on the airport.

One thing in particular digs at me. Regarding lighting, I always found it odd that airports resort to indirect lighting which illuminates rooms in such a way that makes any given point in any given day indistinguishable from any other. They flood rooms such that shadows are absent and exposure is distributed without any relevance to one's geographical position in a room or the actual time of day. This seems surprising, considering the dominion

So, don't you find it odd that a space which is so dependent on clock-based efficiency would create an environment that is essentially timeless? Lighting not only disrupts one's sense of position but also of time in such a way that can have profound effects on the way a person functions biologically and psychologically. In Athens, I spent a night at the airport in a room void of natural light, something that many rooms in this particular airport lacked. If you've ever done something like this, it has a profound effect on how the body operates the rest of the day (that is, it doesn't). By manipulating the body's exposure to light at odd intervals, you can greatly disrupt sleep-wake cycles (genetic studies done with flies and mice confirm the biological clock factor). Sleeping directly under artificial light takes a noticeable toll on the body as it tries to accommodate its need for sleep and the environmentally induced desire to stay awake.

I know, I know. Nobody is really supposed to sleep in airports; they are, as Duncan mentions, for movement and efficiency, which are antithetical to the act of sleeping. However, if you happen to fall asleep and don't know for how long, nothing other than a dizzying configuration of monitors can give you any insight into WHEN you are (such was the case at Heathrow where I narrowly made my flight). In that respect, airports seem to be a vacuum of space. Goods are duty-free, it has no time, and as Duncan deftly observes, subtle variation in spatial configuration confuses feelings of geometrical position within it. Although it is your gateway to anywhere, the airport is nowhere, such that a person awaiting a flight in Barajas (Madrid) could feel as if they were flying out of LaGuardia (New York). Time reinforces that notion of nowhere, since time-zone differences become irrelevant when inside the airport it's zero hour regardless.

I have no conclusion, it merely reflect on the observations of another and try to answer the various questions that those observations induce. I must say, turning off this light in my bedroom at 3:30AM, I'm just happy that my home is somewhere.

And the Feds come marching in...

2007-12-29T01:13:00.000-05:00

Megan McArdle of The Atlantic responds positively to a Gary Becker piece virtually absolving banks of their responsibility (moral, mostly) in the sub-prime mortgage debacle. Both the article and the response offer fairly predictable reactions to the issue, choosing to fall back on economic theory rather than investigate and refine how the issue came about in the first place. Becker thinks that even those who didn't fully understand what they signed up for would have signed up had they actually known the terms anyways. Somehow, they both translate this into a moral victory for banks. However, they may have missed the point.

The greatest flaw in macro-economic theory is its amazing reluctance to adequately address issues of decision-making that occur at the micro-economic level. What bankers did is sell people sub-prime mortgages to less adept borrowers the way that used car salesmen sell lemons, backed by the same incentive - commission - that spoils the free market assumptions of perfect information (the individual dealers have an incentive to sign people up regardless of their ability to pay, since their pay neither fluctuates with the quality of a borrower nor do they absorb any of the responsibility for their repayment). However, unlike cars, dealers can sell borrowers on mortgages stacked in 30 pages of fine print and a world of promise, and cars are regulated by the government, financial packages, however, are not.

What's even MORE interesting, however, is that neither even questions WHY people at an individual level would be willing to entangle themselves in these contracts. Becker only alludes to how little access to credit for poor and minority borrowers made the availability of sub-prime attractive. Truth is, the REASON they would be willing to accept these loans is because they do not get offered the same resources anywhere else. And, ironically, reckless and misguided speculation on Wall Street drove CDO prices (collateralized debt obligations) through the roof compared to their real risk-value. This drove banks to offer sub-prime credit more and more as the financial packages they sold to investment firms increased in value. People just had to line up and sign.

Furthermore, saying that government intervention is a bad idea completely misses the point. Wealth in this country for middle class and poor persons in the U.S. means owning property. Mortgages are write-offs - therefore subsidized by the Gov - (rent payments are not), and loans for these are backed by the federal government. If you're a lender, the government practically shoves borrowers through your door. What government has failed to do is manage financial packages the way they manage other commodities, ensuring that they comply with minimum standards of responsibility. Clearly, their profitability made the idea of government intervention a nuisance at the time. But had such an effort been made, it might have kept Wall Street from shitting itself, and kept more people in their homes.

Thing is, economics is correct in saying that people respond to incentives, but most people who use economic theory to justify alienating government from ensuring the market functions correctly fail to recognize that it has been the investors and the bankers that have unevenly benefited from the system of incentives established by the government to push the economy merrily along. Artificially low interest rates, a lack of regulation in the public borrowing sector, as well as inadequate oversight of market offerings to the public all contributed to these incentives. We're all just greedy bastards I guess.

2007-12-20T12:17:00.000-05:00

Probably my favorite artist on the underground music scene for a few years , her raw and highly metaphorical music may soon become pop mainstream here in the States. Keeping her from said "accomplishment"? Censorship for one, righteousness for another. Her newest single "Paper Planes" is a novelty. The official video is here. A YouTube reproduction is here (listen to the song, watch only the last minute or so). From that, fourletteredword pretty much nails the subtext on the head:

international relations are similar to the drug game. she's characterizing the US as a dealer...the dealer that's on top of things...

there are a couple references too..."pirate skulls and bones (yale...), sticks and stones and weed and bombs...runnin when we hit 'em..."..."no one on the corner (in the world of politics) has swagger like us".

we do as we please..."some of them i murder...some i let go"...we bang bang bang and take your money...

Subtle? Not so much. Uncommon vocabulary for an artist on the verge of the mainstream? You bet. Then again, maybe it speaks volumes about how far we've come in discussion of America's role on the international stage, where stakes are probably highest in the 3rd world. After all, you can't be against anything we do internationally without being inherently anti-America. Sri Lanka born, she knows poverty and violence first-hand. In that respect, we're all ignorant, so I find it compelling that stories and opinions have found an audience through entertainment. Sadly, MTV is compelled to neutrality and advertiser/stock-holder subservience, who either ignore or intentionally avoid the immense educational value that visual and audial ideas like "Paper Planes" brings to the mainstream public forum.

?

2007-12-19T22:39:00.000-05:00

Over the last few months I have tried to familiarize myself with the inner-workings of the Blog community. To some, Blogging in its many forms, YouTube and PodCasts included, have been regarded as a number of things. For some, the blog is the great hope for the democratic revolution that the internet once promised at its inception. For others, it serves as a marshland of marketing potential that capitalism will inevitably suck dry. Not to say that I'm against capitalism; on the contrary, I possess an entrepreneurial spirit, driven by the same incentive-based reasoning that defines post-Renaissance humanity. Or democracy. Or creativity. Or whatever.

To phrase it precisely, "whatever" is the subject of these posts, really a reflection of the very things that induce me to "consume". Creativity, information, hypocrisy and argument. So as blogs have filtered, debated, and prioritized the randomness of life in the interest of sensibility so will I.

Experience is the great vehicles for the intellectual and creative consumption in life. So let me ask you, what the hell are you doing reading this? Or, better yet, what the hell am I doing writing this? Ice cream awaits.

Kyle

P.S. Shout out to Duncan. http://voicethrowing.blogspot.com/.