data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc0ab/cc0abcf08b8744d596a449bd4a401e420e9f0208" alt=""
Inspiration:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6daea/6daea3447c053152cd00507333ad01cfdae8edec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3ba/ab3ba64b3ebb74582f69a9f664a6561eb24b15a6" alt=""
It occurred to me that in discussing the rigid definitions of graffiti, we became absorbed in a discussion about what defines the authentic in this particular culture. So it begs the question: do these particular works of (mostly) commissioned street art belong to the genre defined as graffiti? WebUrbanist seems to think so. Yet if the medium is more important than the meaning (paid art by chalk is more authentic than rebellion by projected image), hasn't the spirit of graffiti already been abandoned?3D graffiti, whether it’s in chalk or paint, on walls or the street, represents a new way of combining the mastery of Renaissance art techniques with the gritty, ephemeral qualities of amazing street art. These 3D street artists gives graffiti a whole new meaning – one that departs from the conventional interpretation of graffiti as vandalism in the form of images and letters scrawled on public property. Artists like Kurt Wenner, Eduardo Relero and Tracy Lee Stum create street art that’s so incredible it is almost impossible to pass by without being sucked in to the worlds they create on asphalt and concrete surfaces.